Join MultiplyOpen a Free ShopSign InHelp
MultiplyLogo
SEARCH

I'LL GIVE YOU 20 BUCKS IF YOU CAN SHUT ME UP.

Blog EntryAug 21, '07 11:44 PM
for everyone
Who is Malu Fernandez? In a nutshell, probably the most unfortunate Filipina writer this online generation has ever seen. I've never seen a journalist so universally reviled. The link I've attached is my two cents on the issue; other than the occasional pundit-y comment on MLQ3's blog, I don't intend to further discuss it because my heart actually bleeds for the poor woman.

Why? An overwhelming majority of angry Filipino bloggers have decided to strike the low blow and target Malu Fernandez's... um... ample figure. Comparisons to a popular Muppet and roast suckling pigs abound, with a thousand and one additional fat jokes to add insult to injury, all furiously aimed at cutting the hapless journalist down to size.

Oh yeah, Philippines, that's real mature.

I think Malu Fernandez made a serious error in judgment when she focused on the perils *roll eyes* of flying economy; the editors of the Manila Standard Today and People Asia may have a role to play in this unfolding media crisis. However, I cannot accept, in all honesty, how some in the Philippine blogging community have chosen to deal with Malu Fernandez's crass articles. Righteous anger has its time and place, but this isn't a school playground. Name-calling? Please! What are we, six-year-old children? Calling someone out for their size instead of focusing on the matter at hand is childish and totally unclassy.

I have struggled almost all my life as a plus-size individual, and I pity Malu, if anything, for the fact that, in addition to all the online outrage aimed at ousting her from her positions at the Manila Standard Today and People Asia, people are calling her all kinds of awful names focusing on her weight. What she wrote was unacceptable, and she must live up to the consequences of her actions, but have we proven ourselves on a higher level of class and intelligence than hers when we whittle her down to size? Even the venerable Mr Quezon III has sponsored an informal photo caption contest, a move that encourages the riffraff to come up with the meanest possible things to say about Malu Fernandez. Have we proven ourselves classier than she is, when we take the official website of the Manila Standard Today and hold it hostage until our demands are met?

Our actions thus far indicate we are not much different from Malu Fernandez. Look at our blog entries! We can see it clear as day. A random sampling of comments:
  • “Ang masasabi ko lang ke Malu ay " BULBOL Ka!!" (All I can say to Malu is, 'you are pubic hair.')
  • "Let's spam that b****."
  • "Freaking pig Malu Fernandez! To think that she can write stuff like this, when she looks so much of a pig herself. oink, oink... "
  • "mukhang lechon itong si malu." (This Malu looks like spit-roasted pig.)
  • "You're bacon, b****!"
  • "The Goodyear Blimp's acerbic wit"
  • "Malu Fernandez dikit mo ilong mo sa putik!" (Malu Fernandez, stick your nose in the mud.)
Every Filipino blogger has the right to say their piece on Malu Fernandez. She has wounded us deeply with what she has written. She will pay, one way or the other, with the loss of a job and the respect of her peers, as well as the near-universal revulsion of the Philippine blogging community. However, I entreat all Filipino bloggers to take the higher, classier, dignified road, and cease the superficial attacks on Malu.

This mob mentality has got to stop. We need to take a step back and conduct ourselves with the class and decorum expected of thinking, intelligent individuals. The demands - her ouster from or a boycott of both publications (I support the former and vehemently disagree with the latter), a public apology, or whatever - of the local blogging community notwithstanding, we cannot honestly expect a worthy conclusion to this issue with tempers running high and heckling becoming a set standard.

Are we so arrogant to crucify this woman for offending us, that we forget we, too, have undoubtedly offended other people in the course of our own lifetimes? We are all Malu's, maybe not at this level, but let s/he who has never offended anyone else - EVER - cast the first stone.

I believe in forgiveness. I believe in restorative justice. I believe Malu Fernandez should be treated with respect despite her insensitivity to the feelings of Filipino OFWs. I believe we as a united Filipino blogging community have the rare opportunity to take the higher road and exhibit the most beautiful thing about God's grace: forgiveness given though undeserved.

Enough has been said. I think it is time to let the healing begin.

Malu, you hurt me deeply, and offended me greatly, but I forgive you. I pray all who have been offended by what you wrote can find it in their hearts to forgive you too. I also pray wisdom for you, that God reveals to you many lessons to learn from this situation. Whatever happens to you (and your career) in the future, do know that God allows it to happen for a reason, and I pray you can accept it with grace and class.

80 CommentsChronological   Reverse   Threaded
redalmighty wrote on Aug 22, '07
The temptation of the age is to look good without being good. -- =P
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 22, '07, edited on Aug 22, '07
The temptation of the age is to look good without being good. -- =P
Well-said, Red.

(Let me think of an equally vague yet appropriate adage.)
happydreamer wrote on Aug 22, '07, edited on Aug 22, '07
Ganns! I myself have been trying to find the words to express what you have so eloquently said here. Well done. Indeed, this mob mentality against Malu has to stop. Not to say that she has not done wrong by saying such awful things about OFWs, because she has - it's how we are reacting to her that is just as shameful and debased. :) Mind if I forward this to friends?
kitiwiti wrote on Aug 23, '07, edited on Aug 23, '07
well gannon, this is my 2cents about it: http://lappy.multiply.com/journal/item/135 nasa blog ng isang bespren ko na nagmigrate na sa HK...

and the truth is, with everyone on the let's-bash-malu-she's-such-a-fat-pig bandwagon, i find myself feeling sorry for her. oo na , tama na, sobra na, palitan na.

maybe Manila Standard should just fire her, like what they did to Isaiah WAshington of Greys Anatomy (they DID fire him , right?)...eh di end of story. She might even learn what responsible journalism is about. And that there is no such thing as freedom of speech, not really.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07
Hi Ginny!

Thank you for your kind words. I complete agree with your assessment of how we've reacted.

Please feel free to take whatever comments you wish; if it's not too much trouble, just include a link to my blog somewhere in your text. Thanks.

God superbless!
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07
kitiwiti: Interesting side comment on Washington. While this is more of a social division issue than a race issue, there are still some similarities worth considering.

Take note, though: Washington was hired by a rival network shortly after leaving "Grey's Anatomy." I honestly don't think Fernandez has the luxury of a second option. But time will tell.

Thanks for passing by.
rubycube wrote on Aug 23, '07
Finally, somebody said something. I was enraged by Malu Fernandez's article but the vicious comments about her physique were just immature and pathetic. If she were not overweight, would people crucify her like that? How else would other people insult her? Her sin was being arrogant, not overweight.

Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07
Thank you for your thoughts, Rubes. :) God superbless you.
muidhin wrote on Aug 23, '07
I saw an article that says she resigned, pray, I'm slow, why does she have to resign again? Is it because she insulted our "heroes"? We insulted her, does that mean she can force us all to die? Not as smart as what you have but, well.. everything that's happening is just TOO much..
leelock wrote on Aug 23, '07
I actually think the below-the-belt comments are hilarious. She ridicules OFWs, well they ridicule her back.
kagey wrote on Aug 23, '07
While I do feel that name-calling is uncalled for, I must say that the ire directed at her is the direct result of her own arrogance and self-absorption. My attack on her is as a journalist and Filipino... her writing style is devoid of wit, her take on the less financially blessed is a shame and her editors equally at fault for allowing her article to see print.
kitiwiti wrote on Aug 23, '07
yup kagey you've encapsulated everything i wanted to say. gannon, isaiah's issue was not of race but of bigotry (he made a comment that another dude was gay). Malu is a bigot bec she is intolerant of OFWs with their Players colognes and whatnot.
poink wrote on Aug 23, '07
great blog ganns...i received the email about her article directly, and tho it was irritating, did not deserve all that you pointed out. and true about casting the first stone...are we all so (cluelessly) blameless? tsk.

great blog. :)
johnmarzan wrote on Aug 23, '07
i don't agree with the fat jokes or the name calling. but i do support the information campaign of some re her articles by quoting and linking to it and passing it around. they link, we decide.

Malu, you hurt me deeply, and offended me greatly, but I forgive you.


malu AFAIK, never asked for your forgiveness or apologized. but maybe i'm wrong.

if she did, can you please link to the article or cite your source? but if you forgive malu anyways, good for you.

when given the chance to respond, she chose instead to taunt those who were offended with her article. those are the facts as far as i know.
go0dspeed wrote on Aug 23, '07
That's a fresh perspective from the muddled blogosphere "mob". Maybe we can invite here to church :)

I've had my share of rants as well.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07
muidhin said
I saw an article that says she resigned, pray, I'm slow, why does she have to resign again? Is it because she insulted our "heroes"? We insulted her, does that mean she can force us all to die? Not as smart as what you have but, well.. everything that's happening is just TOO much..
Hi muidhin!

I doubt the veracity of that Geocities resignation. ;)

And yes, everything that's happening is just TOO much. 100% agreed.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07
leelock said
I actually think the below-the-belt comments are hilarious. She ridicules OFWs, well they ridicule her back.
... and the circle of life continues. ;)
iisgenius wrote on Aug 23, '07
Malu finds her article funny, and proudly mentioned her "ascerbic wit". She also mentioned that her friends find her article funny.

I happen to find it equally funny when pinoy bloggers resorted to name calling (i.e. calling her ms. piggy, lechon, baboy, oink oink). What's god for the goose is good for the gander.

The best defense is not to offend. Now it's time for her to put a bag on her ugly fat ass everytime she goes out, hahaha!
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07
kagey said
While I do feel that name-calling is uncalled for, I must say that the ire directed at her is the direct result of her own arrogance and self-absorption. My attack on her is as a journalist and Filipino... her writing style is devoid of wit, her take on the less financially blessed is a shame and her editors equally at fault for allowing her article to see print.
KAGEY! :D

I also agree with you. My original post on her wasn't very kind, either, and it addressed Malu on levels similar to yours (i.e. self-absorption, poor writing skills, and insensitivity to the OFW situation; the post to which you've commented identified editorial responsibility as an additional issue). I only wish a good number of members of the Filipino blogging community were half as focused in their diatribes as you are.

Righteous anger is a good thing. Succumbing to that anger and ridiculing her as an obese person, in my opinion, took away from the greater issues, which you identified were her journalist skills and her insensitivity to her fellow Filipinos.

Your commenting here is an honor I appreciate and welcome. Thanks, Kage.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07
A clarification: you are right, Washington got into hot water because he hurled a word at T.R. Knight that many consider offensive. He later tried to make it a race issue by saying he was being targeted because he was black. My bad.

(The tiniest of corrections: Malu said it was Axe to which she took olfactory offense, not Player's.)
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07, edited on Aug 23, '07
John Marzan! (I'm a fan!) Thank you for passing by.

One need not wait for an apology to let another know the former has been offended. Haven't we all had a situation or two in life when we've offended another person without ever knowing we had done so?

Malu never did ask for forgiveness, nor did she apologize. However, I did take offense, and I am taking the initiative to let her know I was offended but I have let it go.

(A similar case would be when Simon Cowell insulted Mandisa Hundley's ample figure on American Idol's Season Five, saying the show would need "a bigger stage." She later told him, "You hurt me, I cried, but I've forgiven you." Simon apologized on the spot. The apology came afterward, but had Mandisa not told him she was offended, he may never have known.)

Malu's reaction to the initial backlash was regrettable. She is now reaping the consequences of reacting with anger and pride instead of humility. But her otherwise immature reaction does not mean we, too, should react immaturely (i.e. call her out for being fat). That makes us no better than Malu.

(I read on MLQ3's blog that some believe revenge is best served cold. In life, I've found that reactions of forgiveness to an initial offense are the ones least expected by the offender, and wondrous things - good things! - have happened as a result.)

Let's make this clear: I am not defending Malu nor am I saying she should not suffer the repercussions of the closed-minded statements she made in her columns. I am simply suggesting that we, the Filipino blogging community, should deviate from reactions that, while arguably justifiable, contribute little to the resolution of this issue.

Thank you for visiting, John. It's a pleasure and an honor.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 23, '07
That's a fresh perspective from the muddled blogosphere "mob". Maybe we can invite here to church :)

I've had my share of rants as well.
Why not? ;)

Me, I'd rather meet up with some of the angrier bloggers. I think they deserve to let it all out so the healing and forgiveness can begin.

I volunteer myself as a sounding board.
happydreamer wrote on Aug 23, '07
Let's make this clear: I am not defending Malu nor am I saying she should not suffer the repercussions of the closed-minded statements she made in her columns. I am simply suggesting that we, the Filipino blogging community, should deviate from reactions that, while arguably justifiable, contribute little to the resolution of this issue.
Alleluia, Ganns. Egg-zactly. :)
rhen2morata wrote on Aug 24, '07
i think you did not see the article that came out last April, where she said the same thing, she got away with that, her editors got away with it. now she did it again by writing that article in June.. She really deserved all the name-calling she got. I hope you guys understand how we (OFWs) feel. I'm a UP grad and if i name-call her it doesn't mean that i'm the same as that MALU bitch!
dizzyb wrote on Aug 24, '07
we've become a nation too easily slighted, unfortunately by views na minsan totoo din naman. i feel sorry for malu fernandez for not knowing better. but it seems she has taken her humble pie even if she chokes on it. one thing i deplore is the call for a public apology when in fact what the "mob" was clamoring for was a public humiliation.and for some, even that didn't seem enough. if we can summon outrage over a "socialite's" snobbish behavior, then how come we keep silent about matters that hound our country even more - like corruption, the extra judicial killings, the declining state of education, unemployment, poverty - the very factors that contribute to the growing number of OFWs. if only that outrage could be channeled into making our public officials more accountable, i'm certain it would move our country forward by leaps and bounds.
silverstcloud wrote on Aug 24, '07
well whatver the method was for most pinoys - name-calling and all - it did the trick. she's resigned. :)
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 24, '07, edited on Aug 24, '07
i think you did not see the article that came out last April, where she said the same thing, she got away with that, her editors got away with it. now she did it again by writing that article in June.. She really deserved all the name-calling she got. I hope you guys understand how we (OFWs) feel. I'm a UP grad and if i name-call her it doesn't mean that i'm the same as that MALU bitch!
Dear rhen2morata:

This is what I believe in: all human beings have inalienable rights that entitle them to a basic level of respect, regardless of alma mater, job description, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, and body size.

Now, if a human being engages in an activity or behavior that disrespects another human being's inalienable rights, in a just society, the former can expect to receive punishment for that disrespect. I am a Christian who believes that the punishment provided should not violate that person's inalienable rights.

Rhen2morata, you are entitled to your anger; your fury is understandable. I offer you these to consider:

> Malu Fernandez's journalist career is probably dead beyond saving.
> Malu Fernandez and her family have received death threats, harassing phone calls, and hundreds of personal insults across the globe.
> Malu Fernandez is virtually persona non grata. I don't think she would dare show her face anywhere for the next few months.
> Malu Fernandez can probably expect her Luscious store to close down, at least temporarily.
> Malu Fernandez has probably been abandoned by most of her social circle.
> Malu Fernandez has experienced the worst kind of public humiliation any Filipino can hope to never experience.
> Even if Malu Fernandez resigns and apologizes, few believe she is sincere.

This woman has lost virtually everything! Isn't this more than enough punishment? Most Filipinos angry with Malu Fernandez are probably thinking, "This serves her right!" Well, I think these Filipinos got what they wanted, and more, judging from the above list. Plus, they enjoyed the cheap thrill of calling her terrible names we wouldn't wish upon our own plus-size friends.

Tell me something, Rhen. You have a family that loves you, a job that we all agree is honorable, safety, health, the respect of family and friends, and a hopefully bright future. Malu has lost all that. I hope that your calling her a bitch and saying you're not like her, especially since you tout your University of the Philippines education, as well as your seeing for yourself that Malu's professional and social life is virtually over, somewhat eases the sting of what she's written.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 24, '07
dizzyb said
we've become a nation too easily slighted, unfortunately by views na minsan totoo din naman. i feel sorry for malu fernandez for not knowing better. but it seems she has taken her humble pie even if she chokes on it. one thing i deplore is the call for a public apology when in fact what the "mob" was clamoring for was a public humiliation.and for some, even that didn't seem enough. if we can summon outrage over a "socialite's" snobbish behavior, then how come we keep silent about matters that hound our country even more - like corruption, the extra judicial killings, the declining state of education, unemployment, poverty - the very factors that contribute to the growing number of OFWs. if only that outrage could be channeled into making our public officials more accountable, i'm certain it would move our country forward by leaps and bounds.
Wow. I'm blown away by your assessment, dizzyb. Excellently put. I tip my hat off to you.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 24, '07
well whatver the method was for most pinoys - name-calling and all - it did the trick. she's resigned. :)
Why does my gut tell me this isn't over?
mikemarquez wrote on Aug 24, '07
dizzy b, that was very well placed. focusing on things more important.

I would definitely want to think that everyone on this planet was as objective and classy as gannsdeen, but truth of the matter is ,it's easier said than done when emotions come into the equation. what malu said and wrote about was uncalled for. OFWs have nothing but good to say about our country especially the people when they are asked about philippines, they usually think about the positives of our country instead of its many flaws, so i'm guessing here.. maybe their name-calling was in reaction to what a fellow filipino wrote and ranted about them was so much in contrast to how they felt and thought about people back home.

the fact that she claimed she was a socialite and a diva and all the name dropping she did made it worse. for someone who was educated well and was invited to teach at UP , she should have shown more class in writing her article. she said she was being funny and her amigas found it humorous as well on a separate article. it could have been funny if she wrote it on a "third person" perspective and not talk about it as if she was high almighty and better than everyone else. just watch or listen to any stand-up comedian mediocre or good. how she said and what she said would have made even a "snobbish socialite" defend herself so she wouldnt be stereotyped as someone who thinks like malu. to sum it up , i guess malu fernandez when she was writing her article was just full of herself.

so as it is noble to be classy and forgiving, it is to be said that when emotion gets into the equation, it is easier said than done.




kitiwiti wrote on Aug 25, '07
Why does my gut tell me this isn't over?
as long as we have elitist assholes and maybe even irresponsible prangka social climbers, this matter wont rest. in fact, many pinoys are guilty of stereotyping that easily branches out to that mob mentality you guys pointed out as well.

its kind of hard to take sides when i know some of my acquiantances are also capable of being obnoxious and sarcastic, and many of them dont necessarily come from the upper echelons of society, many of them are middle class. (however, none of them are stupid enough to put anything on print.)

everyone should view this as a wake up call and assess how they(we) themselves act in the presence of people who are not 'one of their own'.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 25, '07
as long as we have elitist assholes and maybe even irresponsible prangka social climbers, this matter wont rest. in fact, many pinoys are guilty of stereotyping that easily branches out to that mob mentality you guys pointed out as well.

its kind of hard to take sides when i know some of my acquiantances are also capable of being obnoxious and sarcastic, and many of them dont necessarily come from the upper echelons of society, many of them are middle class. (however, none of them are stupid enough to put anything on print.)

everyone should view this as a wake up call and assess how they(we) themselves act in the presence of people who are not 'one of their own'.
Brilliantly put. I hope we all 'wake up.' There are far too many issues worth more of our time and effort than this. Thanks for that, Mutya. :)
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 25, '07
dizzy b, that was very well placed. focusing on things more important.

I would definitely want to think that everyone on this planet was as objective and classy as gannsdeen, but truth of the matter is ,it's easier said than done when emotions come into the equation. what malu said and wrote about was uncalled for. OFWs have nothing but good to say about our country especially the people when they are asked about philippines, they usually think about the positives of our country instead of its many flaws, so i'm guessing here.. maybe their name-calling was in reaction to what a fellow filipino wrote and ranted about them was so much in contrast to how they felt and thought about people back home.

the fact that she claimed she was a socialite and a diva and all the name dropping she did made it worse. for someone who was educated well and was invited to teach at UP , she should have shown more class in writing her article. she said she was being funny and her amigas found it humorous as well on a separate article. it could have been funny if she wrote it on a "third person" perspective and not talk about it as if she was high almighty and better than everyone else. just watch or listen to any stand-up comedian mediocre or good. how she said and what she said would have made even a "snobbish socialite" defend herself so she wouldnt be stereotyped as someone who thinks like malu. to sum it up , i guess malu fernandez when she was writing her article was just full of herself.

so as it is noble to be classy and forgiving, it is to be said that when emotion gets into the equation, it is easier said than done.




Kudos, mike. If only most were as honest as you.
bettylopez10 wrote on Aug 26, '07
That prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination, against anyone for any reason, but especially concerning ethnic groups, races, or the sexes, are bad things is today a truth of public discourse that is never questioned by anyone considered socially, morally, or politically responsible.

Never questioned in public, that is; for the guilty secret of all, indeed even among the widely acknowledged victims of prejudice and stereotypes — is that, in private, prejudices and stereotypes are usually harbored about someone.

And virtually everyone, whether right or left, black or white, and whatever they think, feel, or say, practices some kind of discrimination about someone.

Perhaps the most irrepressible manifestation of that guilty secret maybe found in the ethnic, racial, or sexual jokes that regularly surface, like ERAP jokes to embarrass indiscreet politicians and to offend those at whose expense the jokes are made.

It is not surprising that we often hear, or hear of, repeated campaigns of moral exhortation against harboring or practicing such attitudes.

Certainly we don’t like the idea of being judged ourselves according to some stereotype of a group that we may belong to.

It is then easy to say that people should always be judged as individuals and never as members of a group. But we must consider carefully whether that noble determination is even possible, let alone whether it is a requirement of morality.

A children’s mantra blares out in sing-song fashion, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”

Words, in fact, can hurt; vicious language is part of the arsenal of the bigot and the bully alike.

Attitudes, however, by themselves, are more likely to hurt the holder than the target. If I avoid people who are different than myself, I stunt my own growth, and have little impact on the target of my disaffection.

But, each of us is likely to translate attitude into behaviors, whether they be sticks, stones, words, or things more subtle.

Unfortunately, prejudice is not simply an attitude that remains internal to its owner; it impacts behavior. When negative attitudes on the basis of differences translate into behavior, we have as a result, discrimination and the social inequity it produces.

Therefore, efforts to reduce prejudice are well advised to take the social context into consideration when focusing on the individuals’ attitudes.

joemzjr wrote on Aug 27, '07, edited on Aug 27, '07
I always smell something fishy when we talk about forgiveness and reconciliation in Philippines. In fact it is one of the filipino traits which hinders the country's progress. We've seen a lot of those from Imelda Marcos to Erap to GMA to politicians who get re-elected despite the fact that they have done something not quite good for the country. In fact pinoys love to forgive and forget. Even in Showbusiness Look at how Ruffa G. and Lolit Solis had their own television shows right after the FilmFest Scam. I dont see forgiveness achieving the ultimate good but rather the worse comes out of it. We learn to compromise and grandstand at issues and problems. Justice is never achieved. We go through the same cycle everyday. the opposite happens here in the US, Imus was fired for commenting something bad against women and african americans. So I guess I dont agree with let's move on and forget about it . I dont blame the people's outburst when they heard the news coz they deserve to be heard and express their emotions and opinions. It was written with a very bad tact so shall it be responded with. Although the people's outburst are a bit rude and at times missing the point, I'd rather not comment on the people's outburst and display and show the world of how emotionally in control I am, how I bear the virtue of foregiveness and putting myself on the pedestal making it appear that I am different from the majority coz I would then just sound like Malu. wouldn't I?
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 27, '07, edited on Aug 28, '07
Joemzjr and bettylopez10: Thank you for your comments.

At the heart of both your comments is how it would appear that, with this blog post advocating forgiveness and reconciliation, I am holier-than-thou and ignoring the people's right to be angry. You have every right to see my post in that way.

Please do understand that I, too, was part of that mob. If you click on the links I've provided several times throughout this blog entry, you'll note that my initial entry on Malu was less than tactful. In my opinion, there were two issues at hand: 1) how Malu wrote hurtful things about OFWs in an initial piece, and 2) how Malu reacted upon receiving the initial batch of criticism, writing additional hurtful things and defending herself in a manner that angered even more people.

I don't think we can expect people to not be angry, and I am not denying them the right to be. I am simply saying that a resolution to the problem can be achieved when we focus on the issues at hand. I believe it is possible to be angry yet civil.

I am not saying Malu does not deserve to be chastised, maybe even punished. Justice needs to be served, but at the same time, I think she needs to be treated justly, and I don't think the Philippine blogging community, myself included, gave her that. We are so divided as an angered society - the fact that we couldn't even agree on a mode of punishment, with calls for everything from firing to national apology being issued - that it becomes difficult to get to a conclusion, much less a just or satisfactory one.

Neither am I saying that we 'forgive and forget,' because I do understand that we are human and it is never easy to forget something that has pained us so deeply. Not everyone can be expected to believe in, adhere to, and practice the Biblical concept of forgiveness, which is to wash the slate clean and forget completely about it.

All I am saying is this: with two issues at hand, my opinion is that it is best to focus on a united stand on how to properly 'chastise' Malu and veer away from the name-calling. I honestly don't think that was asking too much; if it was, well, comment boxes are the best venue to tell me otherwise.

IMHO, the cases of Imus and Fernandez are actually similar. In both cases, both media personalities were eventually taken off their respective media outlets. We, however, do not have the benefit of hindsight: it remains to be seen whether either Imus or Fernandez will have some kind of career - one, two, five, ten years after being taken off the air/print. There is such a thing as a 'career-ending move,' and while America is littered with the corpses of several media careers, it also has given second wind to the careers of some media celebrities.

At the end of the day, I was just calling for an end to the name-calling. If you believe I have some kind of hidden agenda for posting this particular entry, including putting myself on some kind of holier-than-thou pedestal, I don't think there is anything I can do to convince you otherwise. (I was honestly taken aback by the insinuation I had anything more in mind than to just ask we treat another human being, well, humanely.) After all, I cannot honestly hope to ward off criticism or cynicism, and if I've offended you in any way with this post, please accept my apologies.

Thank you for visiting.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 28, '07, edited on Aug 28, '07
Oi vey. It's not over! Follow the discussion over at smoke.
faaip wrote on Aug 29, '07
wow. sikat na sikat ka pala ganns. I had no idea.
atong27 wrote on Aug 29, '07
Gannsdeen:
I am an OFW but not all of us in this category are factory worker, domestic helpers, construction workers, japayuki. Those were the days that our country export working class mostly of the category I mentioned. But not now...there are OFW who are working as (few I personally know) professional financial consultant, teachers, engineers, nurses and many more. Each one of them has its own story to tell and could justify their every decision to live far away from their love ones. Surely not most of you here have travelled the road we have taken. Sabihin na natin, ugaling pinoy that OFW are stereotyped as "unclassy", but tell you, OFWs are the most honest and practical people I know, have earned their living honestly and provide their family with fruits of their labor, we don't have to pretend that we are rich dahil OFW kami but mind you maybe most of the OFWs has more saving that many of "superficial hypocrites" in our society. Whenever we spend our vacations/holidays we have money to spend. Look at the malls, shopping areas -you can easily distinguish OFW dahil it is easy for us to spend without any pretentions.

Malu Fernandez had added insult to may injuries and sufferings OFW experienced. How can she malign the every integrity of OFW -kahit katulong lang siguro naksabay niya sa economy class at least totoo sa sarili..not like hers to show the world she's sooo class and can't afford a first class ticket two-way? I doubt she spend her own money to travel baka nga siguro napanalunan lang niya ang ticket niya or di kaya promo ng isang travel agency friend niya kaya grab niya ang chance and to doubt na siya rin gumastos ng stay nila sa greece baka yun friend pa niya..tsk tsk...

What she had done to us is so inhuman and since she never had the second thought in writing such demeaning article..you can't blame anyone that will not even check spellings just to get back. Di ba may kasabihan that when you hit rock bottom the next logical step is to bounce back. Ang buhay ay weather-weather, if Malu survive whatever punishment she's getting surely someone, somehow, somewhere will get it even -KARMA!

Amen!

gannsdeen wrote on Aug 29, '07, edited on Aug 29, '07
atong27: I completely agree with you!

Mind you, I never said OFWs were unclassy, kaibigan. For the record, I have a relative working abroad for her family, and I witness the difficulties the family goes through everyday without their mother. The Bible itself recommends that nothing separate husband and wife, including work; when I witness a family separated because of financial circumstance, it breaks my heart too.

Neither did I question any blogger's spelling or grammar, kapatid. I even made it a point to avoid talking about Malu's writing prowess.

I just want to make it clear. I agree that what she did was wrong. I'm not defending her for what she did. I am just recommending that we take the higher road, and treat her with dignity and respect, even in our calling for her resignation and/or public apology. When we react with that kind of class - and we can prove that many, many, many OFWs have class - we teach Malu a deeper lesson that money doesn't guarantee class or happiness.

Thank you for passing by.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 29, '07, edited on Aug 29, '07
Benj: WHAT? Hullo, I'm the tiniest of fishes in the largest of ponds.

'Voice of Reason' Doc Tess has it a lot worse than I. ;)

honey0715 wrote on Aug 29, '07
Hi there! Sige na nga, na-convince mo na akong i-forgive si Tita Malu. But you can't make me forget what she did. Hindi ko pa rin mag-gets talaga kung ano ang motive niya to write it. Well, naiintindihan ko si Jose Rizal kung bakit niya isinulat ang Noli at El Fili. Pero siya.....unless her writing reflects kung ano talaga ang true feelings/attitudes ng mga socialites towards OFWs. At least, honest siya! Hmmm, it makes me wonder kung bakit pa siya nagtitiyaga na mag-stay sa Pinas when almost 80% (more or less) belongs doon sa mga ___________. Siguro almost everyday ay nagco-contemplate siyang mag-suicide dahil dito, no?. Kawawa naman siya.


gannsdeen wrote on Aug 30, '07, edited on Aug 30, '07
I don't want to make you forget what she did, honey0715. But thanks for your magnanimous gesture. :)

Thanks for swinging by.
seoul2007 wrote on Aug 30, '07
hi! korea pinoy foundation here... just want to say, this MALU FERNANDEZ or MALOU FERNANDEZ is not human. this MALOU FERNANDEZ think not human. this fatty MALOU FENANDEZ deserve to be called ANIMAL. WE ofws are working day and night, may times we suffered to surrender but we still live to survived then here is MALU FERNANDEZ and her jo-malone perfumes etc. oh my gushh!where this animal came from? she dont even know what this ofw is all about maybe bec. she came from the wealthy family? sus! kaya hnd umaangat ang ating bansa dahil sa mga ilang MALU FERNANDEZ sa ating bayan.. i still rem what my gandpa said: ofw are the backbone of our country.....
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 30, '07, edited on Aug 30, '07
Hello, Korea Pinoy Foundation. I'm keeping your reply here as a sign of my respect for your freedom of speech. It is not an indication of my agreement with your comment. "Animal." "Not human." Wow. I have to admit those are two of the stronger names hurled at her; I'm a little aghast to read it on my blog page.

Thank you for visiting.
madrebella wrote on Aug 30, '07, edited on Aug 30, '07
okay, i feel like i need to put in my 2-cents' worth as well...

apart from Malu Fernandez, i hold equally accountable her editors in both the MST and People Asia. given the propensity of most sheltered affluent people to be self-centered, the editor should take into consideration the possible impact and consequent reactions of the readers if a certain questionable article is allowed to see print. the fact that we do have freedom of speech is not enough, it should be tempered with responsibility... and common sense.
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 30, '07
Absolutely, madrebella. This need for accountability becomes even more apparent in light of the gossip making the rounds that MST and People Asia did not accept Malu's resignation. Do they dare foist Malu on us after all that's happened?

(Low blow: It's not like a advertising or sales boycott would tragically affect MST. I've seen that broadsheet. You could count the number of ads with two hands. People Asia, on the other hand...)
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
madrebella wrote on Aug 30, '07
It's not like a advertising or sales boycott would tragically affect MST. I've seen that broadsheet. You could count the number of ads with two hands. People Asia, on the other hand...)
It seems that People Asia magazine has accepted her resignation, as what appears in this statement in their Multiply site which was likewise published in Philippine Star (according to them).
geewitch wrote on Aug 30, '07
Thank you for writing that. Finally, someone has put into words that uncomfortable feeling I was having in my gut as this whole drama unfolded. True that she wrote horrible, horrible things but there are still many out there who have written worse. In a sense, justice has been served because she has had to face the consequence of her actions but you are right about this whold mob mentality thing. In some ways, we are always looking to find the villain; a person to point our fingers at because, seriously, each individual lacks accountability.
honey0715 wrote on Aug 30, '07
Ay! Siyanga pala. She reminds me of doon sa character ni Rizal (am not sure kung Noli or El Fili), si Donya Victoria...
gannsdeen wrote on Aug 30, '07
geewitch: Thank you for your kind words and sharing your thoughts on Malu.

honey0715: Dona Victorina in "Noli Me Tangere."
tristec wrote on Aug 31, '07
If nothing else this issue with Malu Fernandez has further opened my eyes on how badly we need to change our mindsets.

It’s so easy to be emotionally embroiled in something that hits so close to home to a point that it’s so difficult to separate the issue and the person.

The mentality of an eye for an eye I guess is so ingrained in our culture that it would take several generations before we finally realize that all it brings is a vicious cycle.

And when you take the high ground and go against the normal reaction you end up being on the stand as well.

Makes you wonder if EDSA was all worth it - but hey that’s another blog entry. I applaud you for the points you raised in this blog. I so agree with you.
slaphappypappy wrote on Sep 4, '07
The anger and revulsion Malu Fernandez spat out to the OFW community is only indicative of her personal issues of anger and revulsion. Any psychologist worth his salt will tell you that each individual goes through life projecting that which he or she truly feels at his or her core. So there is no need to humiliate her any further with name-calling. She has laid bare for the entire world to see that she is a very unhappy and angry woman full of self-loathing. The Christian approach would be to pray for her personal “enlightenment” - that she moves towards a realization that she is not the “ugliness” she thinks about herself at her core. When she has made peace with who she is and has learned to love herself, her childhood defenses will crumble. She will then cease lashing out because of her personal demons.

I have heard many in the blogosphere lash out in retribution at Ms. Fernandez. Many were on-point, but the vast majority was vulgarly off-point. I suppose that is the human condition - we react when our sensibilities are so shaken that we are left simply in a state of incredulity and disbelief, until a seething anger seeps in, waiting for the most convenient outlet. I understand the anger out there, and I understand everyone’s need and right to be heard. But applying Hammurabi’s principle of “an eye for an eye” just leaves everyone blind. Perhaps what would have been more constructive is to try to understand Ms. Fernandez’ deep-seated anger, and use that as a stepping stone to understanding our own personal demons. Perhaps then, we can be a kinder and gentler blogosphere.

To the millions of OFW-heroes, there was no degradation of your dignity. You continue to sacrifice for the sake of your families and country. Very few will dispute the nobility of your actions. Victimization is a state of mind, so choose not to be one. Do not give the unfortunate Ms. Fernandez that satisfaction.

geewitch wrote on Sep 4, '07
this is a good article on this whole issue as well:

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryId=90896
lestercavestany wrote on Sep 6, '07
Hey Gannon,

How's it going? There's some good stuff on your blog site. Anyway, I hope we can learn to forgive Malu Fernandez. I wrote an entry about her article and I hope you can find time to read it. It's entitled "One Voice (An OFW’s reaction to Malu Fernandez’s “From Greece to Boracay”)" and I posted it here: http://lestercavestany.com/?p=10

Keep in touch bro!

Lester
gannsdeen wrote on Sep 6, '07
Hello, Lester! I've been well. How great to hear from you! Yes, will definitely check out your blog. Thanks.
iisgenius wrote on Sep 6, '07
The problem with the "forgive and forget" mantra can be sometimes (note: I said sometimes.. not all the time") be worse than an "eye for an eye" especially when it comes to corrupt politicians and idiotic, high brow, heartless nincompoops like this fat sloppy bitch that is Malu Fernandez. She took it upon herself to be insulted and humiliated by millions of filipinos. It is one thing to talk down on a public figure, and another thing when it comes to a group of PRIVATE folks who are just minding their own business and working hard under difficult situation just to feed their families.

This malu bitch is the epitome of a heartless spine whose fatty oil is oozing down her thick skin. She don't deserve forgiveness.. as it is obvious that her apology wasn't sincere. The fat ugly old hag bitch will never learn. It is her habit, and God fobid perhaps her upbringing, to look down on other people that are in the lower class. I, for one, refuse to take the high ground. Although I am a christian.. I am the first one to admit that I don't deserved to be called one... as I am not christian-like. True... there are times when forgiveness is essential.. but not this particular pig fat belly ache Malu.

People attacked her personally because her attacks on the OFW's are personal as well.. and perhaps deep rooted. I will not stand on a pedestal and proclaim that I would be better than her by not stooping to her level. We sometimes need to stand up for assholes like Malu. If we keep forgiving people like her.. she will never learn and just do what she's always been doing. We need to put people like her in a place where they belong... down the drain!

gannsdeen wrote on Sep 6, '07
Dear Ren:

If you have, in your own words, chosen not to take the higher ground, despite your being a Christian, there really isn't anything I can do to convince you otherwise.

Prov 17:27-28 "He that has knowledge spares his words, & a man of understanding is of an excellent spirit. Even a fool, when he holds his peace, is counted wise, & he that shuts his lips is esteemed."
iisgenius wrote on Sep 6, '07
Gansdeen,

Thanks. I will answer to Him when the time comes but for now, the fat sloppy bitch is simply a bitch. I was born a christian (not by choice) and I am ashamed to call myself one as I do not act one. However, there are people who call themselves Christians yet they do not act such way and they proudly say they are christians. I would rather be true to myself than be a hypocrite. I can also assure you that this Malu bitch is a church going, self-righteous hypocrite.

I would rather not shut up to be called wise. I call spade a spade.. and I treat people the way they treat me. At least.. I know deep down I'm not a hypocritical turd like many of the so called Christians.
gannsdeen wrote on Sep 6, '07
Dear Ren:

I respect your forthrightness and honesty, as I do hope you respect mine. I am answering to you differently from the others because you claim to be Christian, so I speak to you in a language that you and I are supposed to share: the language of faith, using portions of the Bible to justify my initial call: Malu Fernandez deserves to be chastised adequately, but still treated with dignity and not name-called.

The point of the Proverbs quote is not to shut up so people will think you are wise. The point of the passage is to remind Christians to weigh their words carefully. Christians are ambassadors of God; they conduct themselves in a manner that represents their Lord and Savior. You tag another human being fat and sloppy instead of focusing on the issue of her writing. You have called some of your brothers and sisters in the faith 'hypocritical turds.' Regardless of whether or not there may be truth to those words, do you think what you've said thus far in my discussion board pleases and honors God, which, as a Christian, should ideally be one of your priorities? Jesus says, "but I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken." (Matthew 12:36)

The definition of what it means to be Christian is clear: a Christian is a person who has a relationship with Jesus Christ, one where Christ is that person's personal Lord and Savior. That person lives his life life by what God says as dictated in the Bible, which that person, as a Christian, should believe is the Word of God, not because he seeks to please God (because without faith, it is impossible to please God), but simply because he is grateful for the gift of salvation.

By nature, we are sinners. The Bible tells us that, by nature, not one of us is righteous, not you, not me, not Malu Fernandez. The Bible tells us that we have all fallen short of God's glory, and by our own merit, we do not deserve salvation or forgiveness.

But once we've received that forgiveness, isn't it only appropriate and proper that we, too, be willing to forgive? Jesus tells the parable of the two debtors, where a man forgave two debtors, and the one who had been forgiven the greater debt was more likely to love the man more. Jesus also tells a parable of a man who great debt was forgiven by someone to whom he owned a large sum of money; that man, when he ran into another man who owned him a significantly smaller debt, refused to forgive that man's debt and had his debtor imprisoned. In the end, he lost everything.

We are, by virtue of Christians, called to forgive. Yes, it may go against what we feel at first. But our first desire must always be to please God. And forgiveness pleases God. We are commanded not to judge lest we be judged. If wronged, we turn the other cheek. If asked to walk a mile with someone, we walk two.

I don't think calling for an end to the name-calling is self-righteousness or putting oneself up on a pedestal. (As I said in a previous post, that was not the intention, and if someone wishes to see it that way, well, there really isn't anything I can do t make them think otherwise.) I think calling for an end to the name-calling is the right thing to do, not just because I am Christian, but because I believe every human being has the right to dignity and respect, regardless of what they may have done to make us think otherwise.

Well, all this could very well be moot. If, as you say, you are Christian not by personal choice, then, Ren, by definition, you are not Christian.
iisgenius wrote on Sep 6, '07
It might be true that I may not be a Christian (morally an rhetorically speaking) because I refuse to forgive that fat sloppy pig bitch Malu. Then again, if I claim that I am not christian-like.. what do we call christians who claim they are christians yet they keep doing the same immoral or un-christian like things over and over again? Just because one is baptized as a christian, go to church often, pray the same prayer every day like a friggin' parrot makes one a christian? Besides, I don't believe in any religion. The most hypocritical people I have known are religious people. The most bizarre thing is that I have also met many atheists who are not hypocrites and some of them has morals than the hypocritical religious turds.

People like Malu should be beaten until they are down, humiliated, and torn to pieces. Like I said.. if you leave people like her unpunished... she will just repeat what she's doing.

I will not give Malu Fernandez the satisfaction of feeling that she can degrade and insult millions of filipinos. I will show Malu Fernandez that there are people who will stand up to her.. or even stoop down to her level so she would realize how sorry of a bitch she is. By the way, please spare me with your bible passages. I would not want to start contradicting your bible passages ;-)
gannsdeen wrote on Sep 6, '07
Ren:

As I mentioned earlier in this discussion thread, this is what I believe in: I believe all human beings have inalienable rights that entitle them to a basic level of respect, regardless of alma mater, job description, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, and body size. If a human being engages in an activity or behavior that disrespects another human being's inalienable rights, in a just society, the former can expect to receive punishment for that disrespect. I also believe that the punishment provided should not violate that person's inalienable rights.

If you disagree with the statement above, any further discussion with you will lead nowhere. We can agree to disagree, and then be done with it.

Until your post, religion was not an issue in this discussion. Other than a reference to 'the Christian approach' by slaphappypappy and this sentence - "I am a Christian who believes that the punishment provided should not violate that person's inalienable rights." - in my reply to a post by ren2morata, there were no Bible passages quoted and no mention of Jesus Christ. I quoted scripture because I assumed we were on the same page: you said you were Christian, and I encouraged you to look at what you wrote from what God told us to do in His Word. It turns out that you are not Christian: you do not have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ (quote: "I was born a christian (not by choice)"), you apparently do not value God's Word ("please spare me with your [not 'our' - Ganns] bible passages."), you place little value in the community efforts of the church ("Just because one is baptized as a christian, go to church often, pray the same prayer every day like a friggin' parrot makes one a christian"), you hold certain members of the church in disdain ("hypocritical religious turds"), and you do not believe in the redeeming power of forgiveness, something commanded us by God ("there are times when forgiveness is essential.. but not this particular pig fat belly ache Malu."). You see Christianity as a religion, despite my Biblical assertions that Christianity is a relationship with Jesus Christ, and choose instead to focus on how some Christians are such hypocrites and how Malu should be torn to pieces. Forget all the other Christian 'hypocrites'; in words and actions, what on Earth makes you think you're Christian?

Had you let me know from the start that you would not honor any discussion based on the Bible, I would not have used scripture, and therefore given you the opportunity to mock something so very close to my heart. Akala ko kasi Christian ka. You tricked me, Ren. You brought my faith into the discussion by claiming to share it; afterward, you used my thread to spit out your hatred of my brothers and sisters in the faith. When I used the one literary text I thought we shared and honored, hoping that God's Word would be enough to get you to reconsider saying such terrible things about Christians and Malu Fernandez, you disowned it and disrespected it.

You do not respect Malu, and you obviously have no respect for a number of Christians, but I was hoping you would extend some element of respect to another human being who had done nothing to you other than suggest an end to the name-calling of Malu Fernandez.

You go ahead and call Malu whatever you want, Ren. It's obvious nothing I say - from a spiritual or moral level - is ever going to convince you to do otherwise.
iisgenius wrote on Sep 7, '07
Dear Gansdeen,

I said I was born a christian (not by choice) and don't consider myself as a chistian because I don't act like one. I never tricked you by saying I'm a christian. Where did you get that idea? Nowhere in my post would you see that I PREACHED about forgiveness nor proclaimed that I'm a Christian. Of course I do not respect Malu. Respect begets respect and it is not automatic. Respect needs to be earned. How can I possibly respect a fat, idiotic, bitch pig when she looked down on the poor OFW's?

I also bashed the Christian Hypocrites. I am afraid that you suffer from SELECTIE READING. I didn't say that ALL CHRISTIANS are hypocrites nor I bashed ALL Christians. I specially bashed the so called Christians who are hypocrites.

Did you say a person's inalienable rights? I am not taking away Malu's inalienable rights. She has every right to speak her mind, and I won't stop her from doing so nor would I demand her to be fired from her job... unlike many people. Where in my post did I try to take away her inalienable rights? Nowhere! I will defend her rights to express herself but I also reserve my right to say what I want about that fat filthy ugly bitch, lol. The last time I checked slavery was abolished decades ago :-) And yes, I do abhor the religious hypocrites as they are the worse kind of christians. I only respect people who deserves to be respected regardless of their race, religion,color, or nationality. To thine ownself be true. I will never preach morality or the word of God because I am not worth it. I do applaud religious people who do not preach yet they practice the true meaning of christianity. I despise people who proudly proclaims to be christians or regular church goers yet they do unchristian acts. You're right.. there is nothing you can say that would persuade me to take the high ground when it comes to the likes of Malu. She is a worhtless piece of human feces, and she deserves to be humiliated, villified,and scorned!
gannsdeen wrote on Sep 7, '07, edited on Sep 7, '07
Dear Ren:

Point #1: Our opinions differ in two respects. One: I think respect and dignity are part of a person's inalienable rights, that a person deserves respect simply by virtue of being a human being; you think respect needs to be earned. You, however, do not think all humans deserve dignity and your respect; you say they have to earn it. This important point on which we do not agree effectively renders moot most discussion that does not include faith.

Point #2: YOU CANNOT BE BORN A CHRISTIAN. YOU CHOOSE TO BECOME A CHRISTIAN. I have said that several times in my past three posts. You need to understand that, so I'll say it again. YOU CANNOT BE BORN A CHRISTIAN. YOU CHOOSE TO BECOME A CHRISTIAN. If Jesus Christ is not your personal Lord and Savior, and you are not living your life by His rules (in His Word), you are not Christian. Period.

Point #3: You tricked me by saying you were a Christian when, in fact, you are not. Your most recent post says, "Nowhere in my post... [did I] proclaim I am a Christian." Your 3:43AM post says, "(Although) I am a Christian." You did say you were a Christian, although you washed your hands of the responsibility by saying that it was not your choice to be one. You also said in your 4:52AM post "I am ashamed to call myself (Christian) as I do not act (like) one." While you are ashamed to call yourself Christian, you apparently did not deny it.

Most of the points I've made in discussion with you - as opposed to all other discussions so far on this thread - were made under the assumption that you were a Christian. Your rejection of my points - including your hasty dismissal of my use of scripture to underline my points - offended me greatly. Do Christians reject the Word of God when it is used to reason out and defend a position of forgiveness and understanding? Do Christians bash fellow Christians? If one Christian offends another, does the offended Christian go about telling the world about it, in effect putting in a bad light God and His family the church?

You say you "applaud religious people who do not preach yet they practice the true meaning of Christianity." I don't know what your definition of the true meaning of Christianity is, but I can tell you this, again, based on Biblical teaching: a true Christian treats other people with respect, regardless of whether they've earned it or not. A Christian doesn't bash.

All of this, again, is moot: you are not a Christian. See Point #2 if you need to be reminded why.

Point #4: I am no more guilty of selective reading than you are. It doesn't matter how many people you bash; you bash one, you bash them all. When Malu insulted a few dozen Filipinos on board that plane, she insulted millions of Filipinos. You insult one Christian, you insult the whole family of Christ. Like you come running to the defense of those OFWs, I come running to the defense of my brothers and sisters in the faith, not to defend their actions but to encourage people they offended to consider forgiveness and restorative justice. Kapag nagkamali ang kapatid mo, hindi mo ba pinapatawad? Sino ba naman ang hindi nagkakasala, ang hindi nagkakamali? At gaano pa kalaki ang kasalanan na hindi ito mapapatawad ng isang tao?

Point #4: Forgiveness implies occasionally having to deny yourself. It's not easy to forgive, especially if you've been seriously offended. That's when we deny ourselves, pick up our crosses daily, and walk with Him. It's surrendering ourselves and our own emotions to God so that He may work in our humility and win the other person over with love. Your quote, "to thine own self be true," is not Jesus talking, that's a quote from Shakespeare, and that is the antithesis of the Christian message. For Jesus, the two greatest commandments were Love God First, Love Others Second, As Much As You Love Yourself. It's the opposite of 'To thine own self be true.' (You'd be surprised at what lies ahead on the other end of the spectrum. Google 'commandments of satan' and look at commandment #3.)

Your posts obviously show how you feel about me calling for an end to the name-calling and possibly encouraging forgiveness of a woman who you think practically deserves total destruction. Since I cannot convince you otherwise, let's just let this be, and you can go off and heckle some other people encouraging an end to Malu name-calling (Start with tesstermulo.com; she'll defend a similar stand and not bring Christ into the picture).

(If you think I am being preachy (because I quote verses from the Bible), putting myself on a pedestal (because I advocate a 'justice with just treatment' approach and not the 'an eye for an eye' approach), or being a hypocritical Christian on the sole basis of trying to reason with you to stop heckling another human being, using both common reason and, with you, the Word of God, because I thought you were a Christian, then please, go ahead and say it. Attach to me all the other things you think about me, call me what you like, then be done with it. Because frankly, Sir, I'm more concerned right now about doing something to help get justice for Cris Mendez than persuading you to stop calling Malu Fernandez names. It's something definitely worth fighting for.)
iisgenius wrote on Sep 7, '07
Dear Gansdeen:

It is truly fascinating that a person with your level of intelligence couldn't understand, or grasp, my point. I am not writing in Aramaic, Swahili, or Latin for you to be so out of touch with your arguments. I will try to make it extremely simple for you so you can understand.

You said that YOU CANNOT BE BORN A CHRISTIAN. YOU CHOOSE TO BE A CHRISTIAN. How could I possibly have chosen to be a christian when I was baptised as Roman Catholic (last time I checked Roman Catholics are deemed to be Christian) at the age of a few months? Tell me einstein... how can an infant make a choice?

Just because I said that I am ashamed of being called a christian (because I do un-christian acts) would automatically mean that I am not a christian? I suggest that you think about this. It's as simple as 1-2-3 and, for the life of me.. I couldn't fathom why you couldn't understand simple logic.

Now, let me point out another of your logical fallacies. I'd say you suffer from selective reading dimentia, lol. It is true that when Malu bashed the filipino OFW's, she bashed millions of filipinos but definitely not the rich and snubby assholes like herself. Now... here's my point. Read carefully and learn. When I bashed the Christian Hypocrites.. I offended millions of CHRISTIANS who are HYPOCRITES. Logic would tell you (if you still have some) that I didn't bash all Christians!

You also said, "I don't know what your definition of the true meaning of Christianity is, but I can tell you this, again, based on Biblical teaching: a true Christian treats other people with respect, regardless of whether they've earned it or not. A Christian doesn't bash". Are you serious?!?! A christian doesn't bash? Tell me you're not serious and it is just a typographical error or simply a brain fart. Have you been living inside a cave or a convent? Are you that clueless or ignorant? It is a fact... a maxim, that millions and millions of Christians do bash. Millions and millions of christians commit un-christian acts (fornication, adultery, theft, robbery, fraud, corruption, rape, kidnapping, etc.). They are christians yet they do un-christian acts. If you still don't get my point.. here's another simple one for you. When a convicted killer (for argument's sake let's say the killer is a christian) is about to be put to death... he is always asked if he wants a priest. The priest would then say a prayer for the christian convict and bless him. The convict is a christian but he committed an un christian act. But then again.. O preacher of forgiveness and all mighty gandeen. You are God's chosen forgiver, aren't you? Would you not forgive a convicted killer? Would spare him instead? You said to forgive and forget. Since you have such a kind and forgiving heart..would you forgive the killer and let him go? Of course, you would say that you'd forgive him but let him pay what he had done. What kind of payment? With his life.. or life in prison?

Suppose a man breaks into your home and rape your sister (this is only hypothetical. Knowing you.. you take things to literary.. and you are oh so uptight, lol). At the same time, he tied you up and your parents while your sister is being raped before your eyes. After he raped her.. the police came and caught the rapist. The day before his trial, he pleaded to you for forgiveness and tells you that he was really sorry and he has found God. He ask you not to file charges against him because if he's found guilty, he will be put to death by the state. Now.. my reverend and most kind friend... would you forgive the man? Remember.. forgive and forget. That is your mantra.

That may be too extreme for you. How about a thief? Would you forgive (and forget) a thief who stole all your money?

I would like to make one thing clear. The only thing we share is we were both baptised as christians but, unlike you, I am un-christian like. You are very revered, kind, gentle, forgiving, God fearing, Holy, saintly, etc. I am not proud to claim that I am un-christian like. I am just being true to myself. I'm a sinner and unforgiving but at least.. I feel very human and not some saintly being, lol.

By the way, I will not revert from calling you names. It is not my style. I only attack when attacked. I treat people the way they treat me. I would like to think that I'm a pretty fair and logical person. I have no reason to call you names. You have done me no harm.

One more thing. It is an honorable thing to say that you are concerned with Cris Mendez in finding justice. I suggest that instead of talking about it.. act on it. Why don't you volunteer to help find his killers? Better yet, why don't you come visit his parents and comfort them with your kind christian words? I'm sure it would help them a lot. Just a thought.. o mister high and mighty, lol. Chill out, dude! I am being facetious! :-)

gannsdeen wrote on Sep 7, '07, edited on Sep 7, '07
Dear Ren:

You've managed to turn my discussion board into a religious debate. I am willing to indulge you, but I have decided to send you my full reply via private message to allow the discussion to return to and focus on Malu. I trust and hope you will respect that decision.

And just for the record, yes, I am doing something tangible about Cris Mendez. As a member of Amnesty International and Greenpeace, as a student at the University of the Philippines, and as a God-blogger, I usually put my money and actions where my mouth is; if you knew me better, you mightn't've posted your little 'high and mighty' taunt at the end of your post, regardless of whether it was or wasn't in jest.
iisgenius wrote on Sep 7, '07
P.S to my previous post to Gansdeen:

You said:" or Jesus, the two greatest commandments were Love God First, Love Others Second, As Much As You Love Yourself. It's the opposite of 'To thine own self be true.' (You'd be surprised at what lies ahead on the other end of the spectrum. Google 'commandments of satan' and look at commandment #3.). Err... "to thine ownself be true" is the opposite of Love God first, etc.? Could you kindly expound on that? I just don't know where you get that bunch of B.S., lol. I think every person who understand basic english would conclude that the meaning of "to thine ownself be true" is be true to yourself.. or be honest to yourself. How is that the opposite of loving God first? Errrr.. hello.. earth to Gansdeen, lol.

Kudos to you if you follow the two greatest commandments (according to Matthew). I, for one, can truly say that I cannot possible love people who instill pain, suffering, and death to other people. I can not definitely love someone like Malu Fernandez. I can, however, love the meek, the humble, the poor, people who suffers from illnesses especially the children, people in war ridden nations. You see, I can never be like you. You are the closest thing to Jesus. Of course you didn't say you are jesus-like. You just talk like you are high and mighty.. or perhaps morally superior, lol.

I am going to Italy next month. Since you are so saintly, I think I'm going to the Vatican and convince the pope to canonize you, hahaha!

By the way, if I bash a catholic priest who is found guilty of molesting a child.. would you also say that I am offending all catholics? I wouldn't be surprised if you would. Your logic flows that way, lol.
iisgenius wrote on Sep 7, '07
Dear Gansdeen:

I don't see the need for you to post your reply privately. The people who come to your website are adults. They have a choice to read or not read our posts. They can think and decide for themselves ;-)
gannsdeen wrote on Sep 7, '07, edited on Sep 7, '07
Like I said in the previous post, I am taking all religious discussion offline so the discussion can focus on Malu Fernandez. Every new post that you and I enter with regard to the Christian faith takes the discussion further and further away from Malu Fernandez. I will take your 3:42AM post into consideration with my reply.
iisgenius wrote on Sep 7, '07
Gannsdeen,

I beg to differ. You were the one who posted about forgiving and praying for Malu. You were the one who brought up the basic christian teachings (forgiving and praying). You were the one who brough up your christian faith (nothing wrong with that) in defense of Malu's fat ugly bitch maladies, lol. Our religious/christian debate has a lot to do about Malu. You are all about forgiveness and atonement. I am all about crucifying the ugly bitch hag, and you based your judgments on your christian faith. If you say it is not the case.. then I say you're out of it, lol.
gannsdeen wrote on Sep 7, '07, edited on Sep 7, '07
Dear Ren:

Fine; I'll respect your wishes and pop my answer onto the public board.

Some defense points:
> Malu offended you and me. My initial response was also anger, as evidenced by the Malu Fernandez hyperlinks in my post. Afterward, I chose to deal with the anger by deciding to forgive and pray for her. Although I did encourage people to forgive her, I did not ask anyone else to pray with me.

> I did not defend, as you put it, Malu's fat ugly b**ch maladies. If anything, I have consistently insisted that she receive commensurate punishment for her actions. (It remains to be seen whether or not she will; until then, I think you and I are united in that one aspect, because she apparently is still writing for MST.)

> While I do agree forgiveness and atonement are Christian actions, they aren't exclusively Christian, and I don't think I should be faulted for suggesting them. For instance, the system of restorative justice, which can be interpreted as atonement, is now being implemented in some countries, including South Africa, as well as being test-run in some states in the USA.

> Let's assume for the sake of the argument that you are Christian, and I am speaking to you as my brother in the faith. Can you fault me for thinking Bible verses would be adequate and appropriate in defending my stance? How was I to know that you would be offended by my use of the Bible?

Furthermore, my quoting from scripture doesn't mean I can adhere to it 100%. Nobody can. I've got skeletons in my closet you wouldn't believe, demons in my past that I struggle with on a daily basis. When I said, "Christians don't bash," for instance, I said that as an ideal, the rule, the standard to which you and I as Christians try to follow (basing it on a Bible verse that I won't quote for fear of offending you); it doesn't mean I succeed at it even remotely. Of course, some Christians will bash. "Love God first, love one another as you love yourself" is the ideal. You and I as Christians could try to follow, frequently stumble, get up, ask forgiveness from God and the persons we've offended, and move on. It's the ideal situation, and certainly not the kind of behavior I am known to display 100% of the time.

Can we agree to disagree?
There are things on which we agree, and there are things with which we disagree. These points of disagreement include the following on Malu:

> The right to respect (I say it's an inalienable right, you say it must be earned)

> Forgiveness and second chances (I say everyone is entitled to it, you say it's selective)

> Punishment (I say justice and just treatment for all, you say total humiliation under certain circumstances)

> Name-calling (I say undeserved in any situation; you say deserved in certain situations)

and the Christian faith:

> What it takes to become Christian (I say one must accept Jesus as personal Lord and Savior, you say baptism is adequate enough to earn the label)

> What it takes to stay Christian (I say relationship with God inspires good behavior, you say good behavior is main standard)

On these things, I hope we can agree to disagree, respecting each other's rights to our opinions on these.

A long overdue apology:
I realize in hindsight that most of the vitriol of our exchange was of my own doing, by putting you on the defensive regarding your own faith (although by your own words, you do not believe in religion, so I'm not quite sure where to place you now). It was counter-productive of me to insist you were not Christian. If I did offend you because of what I said about your faith-walk, I apologize.

I also realize that in calling for an end to the name-calling, I may have said some things that inadvertently offended you, since you feel you are entitled to the name-calling. While it was not my intention to do so, I also realize that you may view my call for Filipinos to stop the name-calling as a way to put myself on some kind of pedestal, a moral high-ground that makes me superior or better to everyone else. It was not my intention, but that may be what you thought or felt. If you were offended by it, I apologize.

I also made some jumps to conclusions in some of my points. For this, I apologize.

I also made some hasty generalizations in some of my points. For this, I apologize.

My piece implies people who name-call are no better than Malu. I said name-calling was unclassy, a behavior unfit for intelligent individuals. Some people were offended by this as well. In writing this, I inadvertently implied these people were unintelligent and unclassy. While I hold that name-calling still does not contribute anything positive to the resolution of the issue, I do recognize that it is still people's right to say what they want to say, and if I am to convince them otherwise, there are better ways of going about it than what I realize now is a shame tactic. For that, I apologize.

Ren: despite your assertion you will not call me names, you have been very sarcastic in your past few posts, and taunted me with words that, while not exactly names, are quite hurtful. I assume that, based on our two-day interaction, I have not earned your respect, and I respect that. It is my hope, however, that you accept my apologies, and, if you feel I deserve it in any way, forgive me for offending you on a variety of levels.

I do honestly want to focus on the plans we're developing for Cris Mendez, and I hope we can put this behind us. Thank you for posting.
darakz wrote on Sep 10, '07
I am a Christian and believe in forgiving people who offended us. I don't know if Malu truly asked apologies to the OFW's. But as i read her apologetic article instead she lamented more insult to the lower class. Can we blame all this OFW's who were badly hurt by her bigotry? They are also human who have a temper. And God forgive me i am furious too in her hypocrasy and superiority complex. I cannot justify Malu Fernandez writings. It's reall unacceptable and disgusting. If this bloggers just kept their silence, people like Fernandez will not learn a lesson. We are all human we made mistake but a true Christian doesn't provoke a fight or intentional insult to lower class people. One cannot feel the pain of the other if he never been to where he is.
iisgenius wrote on Sep 11, '07
A reply to Gansdeen:

Point 1. Malu did not offend me. She offended the OFW's and the poor people. I completely abhor what she said, and defended the people whom she offended.. which lead to an offensive.

Point 2. I am not calling for Malu to be fired from her job. Malu did not commit a crime nor she broke any company rules. The proper punishment for Malu is public humiliatio and condemnation. No more.. no less.

Point 3. You're right.. forgiveness and atonement are not exclusively Christian values. Then again, I never said that only CHRISTIAN has those values. In fact, those values are also observed by buddhists and hindus. Again, please do not put words in my mouth. If you are going to quote me, please do so in factual accuracy. Restorative justice for Malu? Again, Malu committed no crime therefore restorative justice to not apply to the fat ugly idiotic nincompoop of a bitch (note: I stress again that this particular argument involves Malu only. Now.. if you would like to discuss restorative justice in social terms.. that's a different story).

Point 4. I never faulted you for bringing up bible verses. I was arguing against your arguments.. not against your faith.

As I have stated previously, I am ashamed to call myself a Christian. To me, it would be so hypocritical to claim that I am christian yet I keep making the same sins knowing they are wrong. I detest being a hypocrite. Many christians (note: I said many christians... NOT ALL CHRISTIAN... regardless of religion) have this notion that since they are just fallible human beings, they committ the same sin over and over again and just simply ask for forgiveness and they'll be fine. Sorry.. but my hypocrisy can only go so far.

Furthermore.. here are my answers to your points:

1. The right to respect is not an unalienable right. I think you are confused, my christian friend. To respect and be respected are not considered as rights. I have the same rights not to respect you as Malu has the same rights not to respect the OFW's. She has lost her right to be respected after she insulted the OFW's. That's why I said that respect has to be earned.

2. Forgiven and Second Chances. Yes, I say it should be given selectively based on the circumstances. I know that I cannot possible forgive or give a second chance to the likes of Charles Manson, Jim Jones, Ted Bundy, or any person who rapes or kills an innocent child. Heck, I can also go further by saying that I can never forgive Hitler, Polpot, Lenin, Stalin, et al., let alone give them another chance.

3. Name calling. Yes, I say it is necessary in certain (not all) situations. There are people who are just so clueless, mean-spirited, and thick skinned that they do not realize what they have done to offend someone.. or they enjoy to offend. This is where the malu fat idiotic bitch comes to mind. You can eventually see that she wasn't really sincere with her apology. She apologized because she received death threats (personally, I think the ones who gave her the death threats are a bunch of idiotic dimwits) and there was a huge amount of hate emails directed at her. Can you imagine if nobody reacted to what she said? Can you imagine if the people didn't bash her to pieces? She's still be saying the same shit! It's as simple as that. The fat little bitch deserves to be called names!

Now.. to answer your question about being a christian. I didn't not say that baptism earns you the label to be a christian. I will repeat this again for the third time. I was baptized as a christian when I was an infant.. which obviously wasn't my choice. Technically speaking I am a christian. When I fill out forms I always check the box that says Christian. In spiritual and moral terms.. I wouldn't call myself a christian because I am such a sinner. Besides, I don't see anywhere in the bible what sins are less to commit than others. All sins are equally bad. I would not want to insult Christians by claiming that I am a christian in deeds and action. I am just simply not woth it. At least God cannot accuse me of being a hypocrite.

There is nothing to forgive.. don't be such a drama queen like Kris Aquino, lol. How could you possibly have hurt me? True.. I was being sarcastic but it is just my rhetorical style.

And yes, I do not believe in religion. I was baptized as catholic but I don't believe in their religious dogmas/maxims or MANY (not all) of their teachings. There is one caveat tho. I believe that religion is good in nature. It is the people who makes religion look bad (remember the christian inquisition or those who commit murder and atrocities in the name of God/Allah/Jehovah/Yahweh?).

Lastly, you have not given me any reason not to respect you. I disagree with your arguments but in no way did I feel that you disrespected me. Like I said.. I treat people the way they treat me. It's a quid pro quo world, my friend. Sometimes GOOD PEOPLE like you need people like me to defend you or speak in behalf of you so mean people wouldn't step on you all the time :-)
gannsdeen wrote on Sep 11, '07
All points well-taken. Thank you.
davidpardo wrote on Sep 13, '07
Actually iisgenius is offended, no matter how much he tries to deny it. It's obvious from the vitriol in the way he writes.

So hurl away my friend and be done with it. Mouth all the insults you can muster against Malu Fernandez if only to feel better about yourself. But I believe in the end, after you have tired of it, you will still find yourself with so much anger. The reasons behind it only you know....

Try checking out a therapist for anger management. I'd hate to see what you would actually do if someone offended you personally.

iisgenius wrote on Sep 13, '07
Well, David.. you yack all you want. If it makes you happy, okay.. I'll say that I was hurt, offended, boofreakinghoo, lol. Actually, a therapist would relieve me of my anger. Perhaps I should go to a whorehouse and let one of those fine young ladies relax my tensed loins.. oops.. I meant muscles, lol!

Umm.. I don't think I would need a therapist. It seems to me that you're a closet shrink. You had me all figured out, hahaha! You'd hate to see what I would actually do if someone offend me? Try offending me and you'll see, hehehe.

By the way, I don't feel better about myself by hurling insults at Malu Fernandez. I just feel so much pleasure dissing the fat ugly idiotic bitch of a nincompoop! I am an epicurean to the core.. if you know what an epicurean albeit I differ on Epicurus' definition of pleasure, hehehe.

Umm. David? Is that all you can throw out? You seem to be so stiffed. When was the last time you got laid? Hahaha!
progay wrote on Feb 14, '08
ang tagal na nito... i wonder what happened to Malu Fernandez?
gouda9 wrote on Mar 26, '08
have a happy cheese day
journalisticskill wrote on Mar 8, '10
Excellent work!

So it's essential that you accomplish a high-quality work.
If you want to develop your journalistic skills, read on to discover...
" Online project management document storage "
Add a Comment